44 Reasons why the theory of Evolution is just a cute fairy
tale for adults and people wanting a job teaching “science” or getting
government grants.
The theory of evolution is
false. It is simply not true. Actually, it is just a fairy tale for
adults based on ancient pagan religious philosophy that hundreds of millions of
people around the world choose to believe with blind faith. When asked to
produce evidence for the theory of evolution, most adults in the western world
come up totally blank. When pressed, most people will mumble something
about how “most scientists believe it” and how that is good enough for
them. This kind of anti-intellectualism even runs rampant on our college
campuses. If you doubt this, just go to a college campus some time and
start asking students why they believe in evolution. Very few of them
will actually be able to give you any real reasons why they believe it.
Most of them just have blind faith in the priest class in our society (“the
scientists”). But is what our priest class telling us actually
true? When Charles Darwin popularized the theory of evolution, he didn’t
actually have any evidence that it was true. And since then the missing
evidence has still not materialized. Most Americans would be absolutely
shocked to learn that most of what is taught as “truth” about evolution is
actually the product of the overactive imaginations of members of the
scientific community. They so badly want to believe that it is true that
they will go to extraordinary lengths to defend their fairy tale. They
keep insisting that the theory of evolution has been “proven” and that it is
beyond debate. Meanwhile, most average people are intimidated into
accepting the “truth” about evolution because they don’t want to appear to be
“stupid” to everyone else.
In this day and age, it is
imperative that we all learn to think for ourselves. Don’t let me tell
you what to think, and don’t let anyone else tell you what to think
either. Do your own research and come to your own conclusions. The
following are 44 reasons why evolution is just a fairy tale for adults…
#1 If
the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon
millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into
another species. Instead, we have zero.
#2 When
Charles Darwin came up with his theory, he admitted that no transitional forms
had been found at that time, but he believed that huge numbers certainly
existed and would eventually be discovered…
“Lastly, looking not to any one
time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties,
linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have
existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have
existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers
in the crust of the earth?”
#3 Even
some of the most famous evolutionists in the world acknowledge the complete
absence of transitional fossils in the fossil record. For example, Dr. Colin
Patterson, former senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural
History and author of “Evolution” once wrote the following…
“I fully agree with your comments
about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book.
If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them …. I
will lay it on the line – there is not one such fossil for
which one could make a watertight argument.”
#4 Stephen
Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University, once
wrote the
following about the lack of transitional
forms…
“The absence of fossil evidence for
intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our
inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional
intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for
gradualistic accounts of evolution.”
#5 Evolutionist
Stephen M. Stanley of Johns Hopkins University has also commented on
the stunning lack of transitional forms in the fossil record…
“In fact, the fossil record does not
convincingly document a single transition from one species to
another.”
#6 If
“evolution” was happening right now, there would be millions of creatures out
there with partially developed features and organs. But instead there are
none.
#7 If
the theory of evolution was true, we should not see a sudden explosion of fully
formed complex life in the fossil record. Instead, that is precisely what we
find.
#8 Paleontologist
Mark Czarnecki, an evolutionist, once commented on
the fact that complex life appears very suddenly in the fossil record…
“A major problem in proving the
theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved
in the Earth’s geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of
Darwin’s hypothetical intermediate variants – instead species appear
and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist
argument that each species was created by God.”
#9 The
sudden appearance of complex life in the fossil record is so undeniable
that even Richard Dawkins has
been forced to admit it…
“It is as though they [fossils] were
just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to
say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools
of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific
creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they
are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation
of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is
divine creation and both reject this alternative.”
#10 Nobody has ever observed macroevolution take place in
the laboratory or in nature. In other words, nobody has ever observed one
kind of creature turn into another kind of creature. The entire theory of
evolution is based on blind faith.
“Every paleontologist knows
that most species don’t change. That’s bothersome….brings terrible
distress. ….They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they remain the same
species and that’s not due to imperfection and gaps but stasis. And yet this
remarkable stasis has generally been ignored as no data. If they don’t change, its
not evolution so you don’t talk about it.”
#13 Anyone that believes that the theory of evolution has
“scientific origins” is fooling themselves. It is actually a deeply pagan religious philosophy that
can be traced back for thousands of years.
#14 Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than
250,000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever.
But instead, we find it ineverything that we dig up – even dinosaur
bones. This is clear evidence that the “millions of years” theory
is simply a bunch of nonsense…
It’s long been known that
radiocarbon (which should disappear in only a few tens of thousands of years at
the most) keeps popping up reliably in samples (like coal, oil, gas, etc.)
which are supposed to be ‘millions of years’ old. For instance, CMI has over
the years commissioned and funded the radiocarbon testing of a number of wood
samples from ‘old’ sites (e.g. with Jurassic fossils, inside Triassic
sandstone, burnt by Tertiary basalt) and these were published (by then staff
geologist Dr Andrew Snelling) in Creation magazine
and Journal of Creation. In each case, with contamination eliminated, the result
has been in the thousands of years, i.e. C-14 was present when it ‘shouldn’t
have been’. These results encouraged the rest of the RATE team to investigate
C-14 further, building on the literature reviews of creationist M.D. Dr Paul
Giem.
In another very important paper
presented at this year’s ICC, scientists from the RATE group summarized the
pertinent facts and presented further experimental data. The bottom line is
that virtually all biological specimens, no matter how ‘old’ they are supposed
to be, show measurable C-14 levels. This effectively limits the age of all
buried biota to less than (at most) 250,000 years.
#15 The odds of even a single sell “assembling itself” by
chance are so low that they aren’t even worth talking about. The
following is an excerpt from Jonathan Gray’s book entitled “The Forbidden Secret“…
Even the simplest cell you can
conceive of would require no less than 100,000 DNA base pairs and a minimum of
about 10,000 amino acids, to form the essential protein chain. Not to mention
the other things that would also be necessary for the first cell.
Bear in mind that every single base
pair in the DNA chain has to have the same molecular orientation (“left-hand”
or “right hand”)? As well as that, virtually all the amino acids must have the
opposite orientation. And every one must be without error.
“Now,” explained Larry, “to randomly
obtain those correct orientations, do you know your chances? It would be 1
chance in 2110,000, or 1 chance in 1033,113!
“To put it another way, if you attempted
a trillion, trillion, trillion combinations every second for 15 billion years,
the odds you would achieve all the correct orientations would still only be one
chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion … and the trillions would
continue 2755 times!
“It would be like winning more than
4700 state lotteries in a row with a single ticket purchased for each. In other
words…impossible.”
#16 How did life learn to reproduce itself? This is
a question that evolutionists do not have an answer for.
#17 In 2007, fishermen caught
a very rare creature known as a Coelacanth.
Evolutionists originally told us that this “living fossil” had gone extinct 70
million years ago. It turns out that they were only off by 70 million
years.
#18 According to evolutionists, the Ancient Greenling
Damselfly last showed up in the fossil record about
300 million years ago. But it still exists
today. So why hasn’t it evolved at all over the time frame?
#19 Darwinists believe that the human brain developed
without the assistance of any designer. This is so laughable it is
amazing that there are any people out there that still believe this
stuff. The truth is that the human brain is amazingly complex. The
following is how a PBS documentary described the complexity of the human brain: “It contains over 100 billion cells, each with
over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells.”
#20 The following is how one evolutionist pessimistically
assessed the lack of evidence for the evolution of humanity…
“Even with DNA sequence data, we
have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective
reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative
imagination.”
#21 Perhaps the most famous fossil in the history of the
theory of evolution, “Piltdown Man”, turned out to be a giant hoax.
#22 If the neutron were not about 1.001 times the mass of
the proton, all protons would have decayed into neutrons or all neutrons would
have decayed into protons, and therefore life would not be possible. How can we
account for this?
#23 If gravity was stronger or weaker by the slimmest of
margins, then life sustaining stars like the sun could not exist. This would
also make life impossible. How can we account for this?
“The fossils that decorate our
family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens.
The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human
evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single
coffin!”
#25 Apes and humans are very different genetically.
As DarwinConspiracy.com explains, “the human Y chromosome has twice as many
genes as the chimpanzee Y chromosome and the chromosome structures are not at
all similar.”
#26 How can we explain the creation of new information
that is required for one animal to turn into another animal? No
evolutionary process has ever been shown to be able to create new biological
information. One scientist described the incredible amount of new
information that would be required to transform microbes into men this
way…
“The key issue is the type of change
required — to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the
genetic information content, from over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of even the
‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism to three billion ‘letters’ (stored in each
human cell nucleus).”
#27 Evolutionists would have us believe that there are
nice, neat fossil layers with older fossils being found in the deepest layers
and newer fossils being found in the newest layers. This simply is not true at all…
The fossil layers are not found in
the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to
be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where
you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown
in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in
nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down
(backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists
would expect them to be) or interlaced (“younger” and “older” layers found in
repeating sequences). “Out of place” fossils are the rule and not the exception
throughout the fossil record.
#28 Evolutionists believe that the ancestors of birds
developed hollow bones over thousands of generations so that they would
eventually be light enough to fly. This makes absolutely no sense and is
beyond ridiculous.
#29 If dinosaurs really are tens of millions of years old,
why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them?
The following is from an NBC News report about
one of these discoveries…
For more than a century, the study
of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have
recovered 70 million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels
and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.
#30 Which evolved first: blood, the heart, or the blood
vessels for the blood to travel through?
#31 Which evolved first: the mouth, the stomach, the
digestive fluids, or the ability to poop?
#32 Which evolved first: the windpipe, the lungs, or the
ability of the body to use oxygen?
#33 Which evolved first: the bones, ligaments, tendons,
blood supply, or the muscles to move the bones?
#34 In order for blood to clot, more than 20 complex steps need
to successfully be completed. How in the world did that process possibly
evolve?
#35 DNA is so incredibly complex that it is absolutely absurd to suggest that such a
language system could have “evolved” all by itself by accident…
When it comes to storing massive
amounts of information, nothing comes close to the efficiency of DNA. A single
strand of DNA is thousands of times thinner than a strand of human hair. One
pinhead of DNA could hold enough information to fill a stack of books
stretching from the earth to the moon 500 times.
Although DNA is wound into tight
coils, your cells can quickly access, copy, and translate the information
stored in DNA. DNA even has a built-in proofreader and spell-checker that
ensure precise copying. Only about one mistake slips through for every 10
billion nucleotides that are copied.
#36 Can you solve the following riddle by Perry Marshall?…
1) DNA is not merely a molecule with
a pattern; it is a code, a language, and an information storage mechanism.
2) All codes are created by a
conscious mind; there is no natural process known to science that creates coded
information.
3) Therefore DNA was designed by a
mind.
If you can provide an empirical
example of a code or language that occurs naturally, you’ve toppled my proof.
All you need is one.
#39 If humans have been around for so long, where are all
of the bones and all of the graves? The following is an excerpt from an
article by
Don Batten…
Evolutionists also claim there was a
‘Stone Age’ of about 100,000 years when between one million and 10 million people
lived on Earth. Fossil evidence shows that people buried their dead, often with
artefacts—cremation was not practised until relatively recent times (in
evolutionary thinking). If there were just one million people alive during that
time, with an average generation time of 25 years, they should have buried 4
billion bodies, and many artefacts. If there were 10 million people, it would
mean 40 billion bodies buried in the earth. If the evolutionary timescale were
correct, then we would expect the skeletons of the buried bodies to be largely
still present after 100,000 years, because many ordinary bones claimed to be
much older have been found. However, even if the bodies had disintegrated, lots
of artefacts should still be found.
#40 Evolutionists claim that just because it looks like we
were designed that does not mean that we actually were. They often speak
of the “illusion of design”, but that is kind of like saying that it is an
“illusion” that a 747 airplane or an Apple iPhone were designed. And of course
the human body is far more complex that a 747 or an iPhone.
#41 If you want to be part of the “scientific community”
today, you must accept the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it may seem
to you. Richard Lewontin of Harvard once made the following comment regarding
this harsh reality…
We take the side of science in spite
of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, . . . in spite of the
tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated commitment to
materialism. . . . we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes
to create an apparatus of investigation and set of concepts that produce
material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying
to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow
a Divine Foot in the door.
“Yet despite more than a century of
digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even
a single bone that doesn’t fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually
every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced
scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate.”
#43 Malcolm Muggeridge, the world famous journalist and
philosopher, once made the following statement about the absurdity of the theory of evolution…
“I myself am convinced that the
theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be
one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will
marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the
incredible credulity that it has.”
#44 In order to believe the theory of evolution, you must
have enough blind faith to believe that life just popped into existence from
nonlife, and that such life just happened to have the ability to take in the
nourishment it needed, to expel waste, and to reproduce itself, all the while
having everything it needed to survive in the environment in which it suddenly
found itself. Do you have that much blind faith?
For years, I have been looking for
someone that can explain to me the very best evidence for the theory of
evolution in a systematic way. My challenge has been for someone to lay
out for me a basic outline of the facts that “prove” that evolution is true.
Perhaps you believe that you are up
to the challenge.
I’ll even get you started…
A)
#1
#2
#3
B)
#1
#2
#3
C)
#1
#2
#3
If you think that you can prove that
evolution is true, please leave a comment below with your best shot.
Or if you would like to discuss
additional evidence for why you believe that the theory of evolution is false,
please feel free to share it by posting a comment below.
For those that would like to learn
more, there are a couple of videos that I would recommend. One is
entitled “Evolution vs. God“…
- See more
at:
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/44-reasons-why-evolution-is-just-a-fairy-tale-for-adults_012014#sthash.9E9pG7SU.A4LJGwBE.dpuf
